Department of Veterans Affairs
Veterans Health Administration
Office of Quality & Performance

 


 

 

Title:  Management of Chronic Kidney Disease and Pre-ESRD in the Primary Care Setting

 

 

Citation:

Management of Chronic Kidney Disease and Pre-ESRD in the Primary Care Setting. Washington, DC: VA/DoD Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline Working Group, Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs , and Health Affairs, Department of Defense, November 2000. Office of Quality and Performance publication 10Q-CPG/ESRD-00

 

Completion Date:
Release Date
August 2000
November 2000

Source(s):

Washington (DC): The Renal Disease and Pre-ESRD Guideline was developed by and for clinicians from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Department of Defense (DoD); 2000.

 

Adaptation:

The guideline draws, in part, from The NKF-DOQI clinical practice guidelines (the National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative, 1997).

 

Guideline Status:

This is a current release of the guideline.  An update is targeted for late 2003.

 

Developer(s):

Veterans Health Administration (VHA), Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) - Federal Government Agency [U.S.]

Department of Defense (DoD) – Federal Government Agency [U.S.]

 

Funding Source:

U.S. Government

 

Committee:

The Management of Renal Failure Working Group

 

Group Composition:

The list of contributors to the guideline.

 

Disease/Condition:

Chronic Renal Disease and Pre-ESRD

 

Category:

Screening, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management

 

Intended Users:

Clinical staff including physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants.

 

Target Population:

Any person with persistent elevated creatinine or proteinuria who is eligible for care in the VA or DoD health care delivery system.

 

Contact Person(s):

VHA

DOD

Thakor G. Patel, MD
Program Chief, Renal Disease
Department of Veterans Affairs (11A)
810 Vermont Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20420
(202) 273-8491
(202) 273-9142 (fax)

tgpatel@mail.va.gov

Paul Welch, LTC, MC, USA

Walter Reed Medical Center

6900 Georgia Avenue

Washington, DC

paul.welch@na.amedd.army.mil

 

 

 

GOALS/OBJECTIVES

 

·         Describe the critical decision points in the management of chronic renal disease.

·         Provide a clear and comprehensive guideline incorporating current information and practices for practitioners throughout the DoD and Veterans Health Administration system.

·         Improve local management of patients with chronic renal disease and patient outcomes.

 

 

INTERVENTIONS AND PRACTICES
The Guideline consists of one algorithm that addresses distinct aspects of:

 

·      Assessment and Triage

·      Pharmacotherapy

·      Diet and Patient Education

·      Follow-up

 

 

OUTCOMES CONSIDERED
Rate of progression of renal disease.

 

 

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS
The guideline is formatted as a single algorithm, with annotations. Presentation of the algorithms is intended to assist the clinician in reviewing and identifying key points that are comprehensively discussed in the guideline document.

 

 

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S) ARE PROVIDED FOR:
Management of Chronic Kidney Disease and Pre-ESRD in Primary Care
For an interactive algorithm with links to the annotations return to the home page and select the link to the Complete Guideline

 

 

TYPE OF EVIDENCE
The guideline is supported by the literature in a majority of areas, with evidence-based tables and references throughout the document.  The evidence consists of key clinical randomized controlled trials and longitudinal studies in the area of chronic renal disease.  Where existing literature is ambiguous or conflicting, or where scientific data are lacking on an issue, recommendations are based on the expert panel’s opinion and clinical experience.  The guideline contains a bibliography and discussion of the evidence supporting each recommendation.


DESCRIPTION OF METHODS TO COLLECT EVIDENCE
The algorithm and annotations were based on an exhaustive review of the literature.  The goal of the literature review was to provide a systematic basis for the development of an evidence-based guideline.  The inclusion criteria for the literature search were related to the population being studied (adult) and the treatment setting (primary care).

The Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms used for the search included key therapies in chronic kidney disease and ESRD, study characteristics, and study design.  In this search, “study characteristics” were those of analytic studies, case-control studies, retrospective studies, cohort studies, longitudinal studies, follow-up studies, prospective studies, cross-sectional studies, clinical protocols, controlled clinical trials, RCTs, intervention studies, and sampling studies.   Study design included crossover studies, double-blind studies, matched pair analysis, meta-analysis, random allocation, reproducibility of results, and sample size.

 

 

METHODS TO ASSESS THE QUALITY AND STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE
The literature search was followed by critical analysis of the literature, primarily by the clinical experts. To promote the evidence-based approach, the quality of evidence was rated using a hierarchical rating scheme.  The value of a hierarchical rating scheme is that it provides a systematic means for evaluating the scientific basis for health care services .  The rating scheme used for this guideline is based on a system used by U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (U.S. PSTF, 1996)..  Decision points in the algorithm are annotated, and the primary source documents for the annotation are graded.

 

 

REVIEW METHODS
Peer Review

 

ENDORSER(S)
VHA’s National Clinical Practice Guideline Council
DoD/VA Clinical Practice Guideline Working Group

 

QUALIFYING STATEMENTS
Clinical practice guidelines, which are increasingly being used in health care, are seen by many as a potential solution to inefficiency and inappropriate variations in care. Guidelines should be evidenced-based as well as based upon explicit criteria to ensure consensus regarding their internal validity. However, it must be remembered that the use of guidelines must always be in the context of a health care provider's clinical judgment in the care of a particular patient. For that reason, the guidelines may be viewed as an educational tool analogous to textbooks and journals, but in a more user-friendly format.

 

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY
Electronic copies available from: Office of Quality and Performance Web Site.

 

Print copies available from:  The Office of Quality and Performance (10Q)
Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs.
810 Vermont, NW
Washington, DC 20420


Copy Statement: No copyright restrictions apply