| |
|
E. Assess LV Function, If Indicated
OBJECTIVE Select the most appropriate method for the assessment of LV systolic function. ANNOTATIONLV systolic function may be assessed by contrast angiography at cardiac catheterization, two dimensional echocardiogram, and radionuclide ventriculography. The relative advantages and disadvantages of cardiac ultrasound versus radionuclide ventriculography, are presented in Table 2.
Adapted from AHCPR Heart Failure Clinical Practice
Guideline, 1995
An echocardiogram is preferable in evaluation of patients who also
have physical findings suggestive of valvular heart disease to assess
the severity of mitral regurgitation along with assessment of LV systolic
function. If the patient does not have an indication for prompt left heart catheterization and LVEF assessment is not available in the hospital, this test can also be performed on an outpatient basis. Of note, Silver et al., (1994) develo ped a clinical rule to predict LVEF >0.40, with a positive predictive value of 98% in those patients who have ALL of the following characteristics:
|
||||||||||||