# #

F. Assessment of Risk Factors

BACKGROUND

Following a traumatic event, a majority of those exposed may experience posttraumatic mental responses. However, after 9 to 12 months, 15 to 25 percent continue to be disturbed by these symptoms. This group with persistent symptoms may have distinct psychological, social, or biological factors that determine the presence of these ongoing problems. The search for risk factors that increase vulnerability to chronic PTSD occurred early in the history of the study of this disorder. The study of risk factors has become increasingly popular, emphasizing environmental and demographic factors, personality and psychiatric history, dissociation, cognitive and biological systems, and genetic or familial risk (Yehuda, 1999).

Brewin and colleagues (2000) conducted a meta-analysis of risk factors and found that gender, psychiatric history, history of child abuse, and prior adversity play a role in the development of PTSD. More important factors, however, were the severity of the trauma, ongoing stress, and lack of current social support.

RECOMMENDATION

  1. All patients should be assessed for risk factors for developing ASD or PTSD. Special attention should be given to post-traumatic factors (i.e., social support and functional incapacity) that may be modified by intervention.
  2. Because of the high prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities in the PTSD population, assessment for depression and other psychiatric comorbidities is warranted (see also VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of MDD and Psychotic Disorders).
  3. Substance use patterns of persons with trauma histories or PTSD should be routinely assessed to identify substance misuse or dependency (alcohol, nicotine, prescribed drugs, and illicit drugs) (see also VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Substance Use Disorders).

DISCUSSION

The following characteristics have been shown to be risk factors for the development of PTSD:

Pre-traumatic factors

  • Ongoing Life Stress
  • Lack of Social Support
  • Pre-existing Psychiatric disorder
  • Other pre-traumatic factors including: female gender, low socioeconomic status, lower level of education, lower level of intelligence, race (Hispanic, Japanese, other ethnic minority), reported abuse in childhood, report of other previous traumatization, report of other adverse childhood factors, family history of psychiatric disorders, poor training or preparation for the traumatic event

Peri-traumatic or trauma related factors

  • Severe Trauma
  • Type of trauma (interpersonal traumas such as torture, rape or assault convey high risk of PTSD)
  • High perceived threat to life
  • Age at trauma (School age youth, 40-60 yo)
  • Community (Mass) Trauma
  • Other peri-traumatic factors including: history of peri-traumatic dissociation and interpersonal trauma

Post-traumatic factors

  • Ongoing Life Stress
  • Lack of Social Support
  • Bereavement
  • Major Loss of Resources
  • Other post-traumatic factors including: children at home and female with distressed spouse

Individually, the effect size of all the risk factors was modest, but factors operating during or after the trauma, such as trauma severity, lack of social support, and additional life stress, had somewhat stronger effects than pretrauma factors (Brewin et al., 2000).

Pre-traumatic factors
Prior exposure to traumatic events is a risk indicator for chronic PTSD (Brewin et al., 2000; Ozer et al., 2003). In particular, a history of exposure to interpersonal violence, in childhood or adulthood, substantially increases the risk for chronic PTSD following exposure to any type of traumatic event (Breslau, 2002a; Brewin et al., 2000; Ozer et al., 2003). Green et al. (2000) surveyed 1,909 college-aged women and found that those who had experienced interpersonal trauma, and those who had experienced multiple traumas, experienced “elevated symptoms.” Dougall et al. (2000) hypothesized that prior trauma history sensitizes victims to the new stressor, thus potentiating its impact. They argued that evaluating trauma history is essential for improving early intervention efforts.

Epidemiological studies have yielded higher rates of PTSD in women than in men in general populations, and there are also a number of gender differences in clinical presentation after trauma. Seedat & Stein studied a series of patients presenting with physical trauma after interpersonal violence and found that “women were more likely than men to have been previously assaulted, or to have sustained injury by a relative or someone known to them, but less likely to have used substances at the time of the assault or to require emergency surgery” (2000). The authors believe that an understanding of gender differences in PTSD rates may eventually help reveal the underlying cause of this disorder.

Pre-existing psychiatric problems are associated with more adverse response to trauma (Norris et al., 2002). Breslau (2002a), in a review of recent epidemiological studies, found that preexisting psychiatric disorder was one of 3 factors that had a predictable effect on the development of PTSD. Both recent meta analyses of risk or predictive factors for PTSD have identified prior psychiatric history as a risk factor for the development of PTSD (Brewin et al., 2000; Ozer et al., 2003). A family history of psychiatric disorders may also contribute to a person’s vulnerability to PTSD. Brewin and colleagues found that “factors such as psychiatric history, reported childhood abuse, and family psychiatric history … had more uniform predictive effects” than did other risk factors such as gender or age at trauma (2000).

Peri-traumatic factors
Foy et al. (1984) published one of the first formal studies to look at risk factors for PTSD and reported characteristics of trauma exposure to be of central importance. Numerous studies have since observed a dose-response relationship between trauma severity and PTSD. The more severe the trauma, the more likely the person experiencing it will develop PTSD. Armenian and his colleagues (2000) found this to be true among disaster victims, Feehan et al. (2001) found higher PTSD rates among more severely-traumatized members of a general cohort, and in a meta-analysis, Brewin et al., (2000) found that “factors operating during or after the trauma, such as trauma severity, lack of social support, and additional life stress, had somewhat stronger effects than pretrauma factors.” Situations where the trauma is potentially life-threatening also carry a high risk of PTSD: in a meta-analysis of 68 PTSD studies, Ozer et al., (2003) found “perceived life threat” to have a high risk value, and in Woods’ study of abused women (2000), the perceived threat of homicide played a role in later development of PTSD. Ozer et al., (2003) also found that dissociation at the time of the trauma is predictive of later development of PTSD. Demographic factors may also be predictive. Finnsdottir & Elklit (2002) found higher rates of PTSD among disaster victims who were young at the time of the trauma, and in a general group of psychiatric patients Neria et al. (2002) found young age at trauma to be a risk factor for PTSD. Finally, biological factors may also be relevant to predicting PTSD. Shalev et al. (1998) measured the heart rate and blood pressure of eighty-six trauma survivors at the time of their presentation at a hospital emergency room, and concluded that “Elevated heart rate shortly after trauma is associated with the later development of PTSD.” In a meta-analysis, Yehuda et al. (1998a) reported that studies “demonstrated increased heart rate and lower cortisol levels at the time of the traumatic event in those who have PTSD at a follow-up time compared to those who do not.”

Post-traumatic factors
The experience of trauma may have life-altering consequences in terms of social status, employment, and health, and continuing difficulties in these areas may contribute to the likelihood that a person will develop PTSD. Feehan et al. (2001), in interviews with 374 trauma survivors, found unemployment to be a risk factor. Likewise, in the meta-analysis performed by Norris et al. (2002), “resource loss” was cited as a risk for PTSD. Impaired social support is a not-infrequent outcome of a trauma experience. Armenian et al. (2000), Brewin et al. (2000), Gregurek et al. (2001), and Ozer et al. (2003) all reported that the loss of support from significant others can pose a risk for development of PTSD. And finally, general ongoing life stress may also play a role. Brewin et al. (2000) reported “life stress” to be more predictive of PTSD development than are pre-traumatic factors such as gender or age at trauma. Norris et al. (2002) found that in disaster victims, “secondary stressors” increased the likelihood of adverse outcomes.

 

EVIDENCE
  Evidence Sources of Evidence QE Overall Quality R
  Pre-trauma        
1 Prior exposure to traumatic events Breslau et al., 1999a
Brewin et al., 2000
Dougall et al., 2000
Green et al., 2000
Maes et al., 2001
Neria et al., 2002
Ozer et al., 2003
Seedat & Stein, 2000
Zatzick et al., 2002
II
I
II
II
II
II
I
II
II
Good B
2 Female gender Breslau, 2002b
Breslau et al., 1999b
Brewin et al., 2000
Finnsdottir & Elklit, 2002
Neria et al., 2002
Seedat & Stein, 2000
Stretch et al., 1998
Zatzick et al., 2002
II
II
I
II
II
II
II
II
Good B
3 Psychiatric disorders or personality dimensions Breslau, 2002a
Brewin et al., 2000
Maes et al., 2001
Norris et al., 2002
Ozer et al., 2003
III
I
II
III
I
Good B
4 Cognitive factors:
Lower intelligence
Neurological soft signs
Brewin et al., 2000
Gurvits et al., 2000
I
II
Good B
5 Parental or family history of PTSD Yehuda et al., 1998b II Poor I
6 Childhood abuse/assault Breslau et al., 1999a
Breslau, 2002a
Brewin et al, 2000
Neria et al., 2002
II
III
I
II
Good B
7 Low educational level or socioeconomic status Armenian et al., 2000
Brewin et al., 2000
Bromet et al., 2002
Finnsdottir & Elklit, 2002
II
I
II
I
Good B
  Peri-trauma        
8 Severity of trauma
Perceived life threat
Armenian et al., 2000
Brewin et al., 2000
Feehan et al., 2001
Ozer et al., 2003
Woods, 2000
II
I
II
I
II
Good B
9 Peri-traumatic dissociation. Ozer et al., 2003 I Good B
10 Youth at time of exposure Brewin et al., 2000
Finnsdottir & Elklit, 2002
Neria et al., 2002
Norris et al., 2002
I
II
II
III
Good B
11 Biological factors such as HR increase Shalev et al., 1998
Yehuda et al., 1998a
II
II
Fair C
  Post-trauma        
12 Resource loss/unemployment Feehan et al., 2001
Norris et al., 2002
II
III
  B
13 Impaired social support system Armenian et al., 2000
Brewin et al., 2000
Gregurek et al., 2001
Ozer et al., 2003
II
I
II
I
Good B
14 Health problems. Norris et al., 2002 III Poor I
15 On-going life stress Brewin et al., 2000
Norris et al., 2002
I
III
Good A
QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation;(see Appendix A)

 

Table B-3. Studies Of Risk Factors For PTSD
Author Number Population Risk Associated With Method QE
Armenian 2000 154 Disaster victims Severity of trauma
Lack of education
Lack of social support
Interview II
Breslau 1999a 2181 General Previous exposure
Multiple exposures
Childhood assault
Phone survey II
Breslau 1999b 2181 General Female Phone survey II
Breslau 2002a N/A N/A Psychiatric disorder
Family history of disorder
Childhood trauma
Lit review III
Breslau 2002b 2181 General Female Phone survey II
Brewin 2000 90,000 N/A Lack of social support
Life stress
Trauma severity
Adverse childhood
Low intelligence
Childhood abuse
Low socio-econ. status
Family psych history
Female
Previous trauma
Psychiatric history
Lack of education
Young age
Minority race
Meta analysis II
Bromet 2002 600 Disaster victims Disadvantaged Interview II
Dougall 2000 108 Crash site workers Multiple exposure Survey/interview II
Fauerbach 2000 70 Burn survivors Neuroticism Interview II
Feehan 2001 374 General Trauma severity (M )
Relation to assailant (F)
Unemployment
Interview II
Finnsdottir & Elklit 2002 104 Disaster victims Loss of family member
Female
Young age
Lack of education
Questionnaire II
Green 2000 1909 Sophomore women Multiple exposure Questionnaire II
Gregurek 2001 42 Croatian vets Lack of social support Questionnaire II
Gurvits 2000 21 F
38 M
Sex abuse
Combat vets
Neurologic soft signs Exam and tests II
King 1999 432 F
1200 M
Veterans War-related stressors
Post-trauma variables
Questionnaire? II
Maes 2001 127 Disaster victims Previous trauma
History of phobia
Loss of control
Alcohol intoxication
  (decrease the odds)
Interview II
Neria 2002 426 Psychiatric patients Female
Young age
Previous trauma
Childhood abuse
Interview II
Norris 2002 60,000 Disaster victims Psychological problems
Distress (nonspecific)
Health problems
Life stress
Resource loss
Youth
Empirical review III
Ozer 2003 68 studies N/A Peritraumatic dissociation
Perceived life threat
Post trauma social support
Peritraumatic emotional responses
Family psych history
Previous trauma
Prior psych adjustment
Meta analysis I
Seedat & Stein 2000 N/A Physical trauma, post violence Female
Multiple exposure
Interview / assess II
Shalev 1998 86 Trauma victims ED Heart rate elevation PE II
Stretch 1998 1000 Active duty Female Questionnaire II
True 1993 4042 twin pair Viet vets Genetic influence Self-report II
Woods 2000 160 Abused women Trauma severity
Risk of homicide
Interview / assess II
Yehuda 1998a N/A ED patients Increased heart rate
Low cortisol levels
Physical assessment II
Yehuda 1998b 22

22
Holocaust
survivors
Offspring
Parental PTSD Interview / assess II
Yehuda 1999 N/A Holocaust offspring Parental PTSD Lit review III
Yehuda 2000 35

15
Holocaust
offspring
controls
Low cortisol levels Urinary cortisol II
Zatzick 2002 101 Trauma victims Previous trauma
Female
Intoxication
Interview II

A PubMed clinical query was used to supplement the findings of two recent meta analyses (Brewin et al., 2000; Ozer et al, 2003). The clinical query for etiology identifies case-control and cohort studies. In addition, a few studies recommended by the workgroup have been included.