Department of Veterans Affairs
Veterans Health Administration
Office of Quality & Performance

 


Title:  Management of Stroke Rehabilitation Care

 

Citation

 

Management of Stroke Rehabilitation. Washington, DC: VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline Working Group, Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs and Health Affairs, Department of Defense, February 2003. Office of Quality and Performance publication 10Q CPG/STR-03.

Completion Date:

 

December 2002

Release Date:

 

February 2003

Source(s):

 

The Management of Stroke Rehabilitation guideline was developed by and written for clinicians by clinical experts from the DoD, VHA, academia, and a team of guideline facilitators from the private sector. An experienced moderator facilitated the multidisciplinary working group that included internists, physiatrists, neurologists, geriatricians, nurse practitioners, occupational therapists, physical therapists, recreational therapists, speech and language pathologists, psychologists, social workers, kinesiotherapists, pharmacists, nurses and rehabilitation/clinic coordinators.

Adaptation:

 

The development process of the guideline incorporated information from several sources into a format intended to maximally facilitate clinical decision-making. The effort drew heavily from the following sources: 1996 VA Stroke/Lower Extremity Amputee Algorithms Guide, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) Post –Stroke Rehabilitation (1995), Royal College of Physicians (RCP) National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke (2000), and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) Management of Patients with Stroke, 20 (1997).

Guideline Status:

 

This is the current version of the guideline. An update is targeted for 2005.

Developer(s):

 

Veterans Health Administration (VHA), Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) - Federal Government Agency [U.S.]
Department of Defense (DoD) – Federal Government Agency [US]

Funding Source:

 

U.S. Government

Committee:

 

The VA/DoD Stroke Rehabilitation Working Group

Group Composition:

 

The list of contributors (APPENDIX G) to this guideline includes internists, physiatrists, neurologists, geriatricians, nurse practitioners, occupational therapists, physical therapists, recreational therapists, speech and language pathologists, psychologists, social workers, kinesiotherapists, pharmacists, nurses, rehabilitation/clinic coordinators and experts in the field of guideline and algorithm development.

Disease/Condition:

 

Stroke Rehabilitation

Category:

 

Diagnosis, Assessment, Evaluation, Secondary Prevention, and Follow-Up.

Intended Users:

 

Designed for use by primary and specialty care providers. The guideline can also be used to coordinate and standardize care and as a teaching tool for students and house staff.

Target Population:

 

Persons eligible for care in the VA or DoD health care delivery system.

Contact Person(s):

 

VHA

Barbara Bates, M.D.
Acting Director, PM&RS
Physical Medicine Rehabilitation (117)
Albany VAMC
113 Holland Avenue
Albany, NY 12208
Phone: 518 626-5817
Fax: 518 626-5467
E-mail: barbara.bates@med.va.gov

DoD

MAJ Charles Walters, M.Ed.,OTR/L
Occupational Therapy
Evans Army Community Hospital
7500 Cochrane CircleFort Carson, CO 80913
Phone: (719) 526-7110

E-mail: Charles.Walters@cen.amedd.army.mil

 

GOALS/OBJECTIVES

  • To provide a scientific evidence-base for practice interventions and evaluations.
  • To guide clinicians in determining the best interventions and timing of care for their patients, to better stratify stroke patients, and reduce re-admission and optimize healthcare utilization.
  • To assist facilities to implement processes of care that are evidence-based and designed to achieve maximum patient functionality and independence and improve patient/family quality of life.

INTERVENTIONS AND PRACTICES

The guideline consists of three phases that are designed to assist clinicians in determining best interventions and timing of care for their patients. The guideline also contains four appendices that provide pharmacotherapy and assessment instruments.

  • Phase One: Assessment
  • Phase Two: Inpatient Rehabilitation
  • Phase Three: Community Based Rehabilitation

OUTCOMES CONSIDERED

Goals for management stroke rehabilitation in primary care include the following:
Preventing complications, minimizing impairments and maximizing function.
Determining best interventions and timing of care, reducing re-admission and optimizing healthcare utilization.

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

  The Stroke Rehabilitation guideline is presented in algorithmic format and is intended to provide a systematic approach to the assessment and management of patients with strokes.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S) ARE PROVIDED FOR:

Phase One: Assessment

Phase Two: Inpatient Rehabilitation

Phase Three: Community Based Rehabilitation

TYPE OF EVIDENCE

The development process for the guideline was evidence-based whenever possible. Evidence-based practice integrates clinical expertise with the best available clinical evidence derived from systematic research. Where evidence was ambiguous or conflicting, or scientific data were lacking, the clinical experience within the multidisciplinary group guided the development of consensus-based recommendations.

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS TO COLLECT EVIDENCE

A systematic search of the literature was conducted. It focused on the best available evidence to address each key question, and ensured maximum coverage of studies at the top of the hierarchy of study types: evidence-based guidelines, meta analyses, and systematic reviews (Cochrane, EBM, and EPC reports). The seed guidelines evidence was carefully reviewed.

The search continued using well-known and widely available databases that were appropriate for the clinical subject. Limits on language (English) and type of research (randomized controlled trials [RCTs]) were applied. The search included MEDLINE and additional specialty databases (DARE), depending on the topic.

METHODS TO ASSESS THE QUALITY AND STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE


See appendix E

REVIEW METHODS
The final draft of the guideline is distributed for review by an at large audience across VA and DoD. Patient Care Services and the Network-appointed Guideline Champions solicit feedback from a broader group of end users. Members of related QUERI groups are also asked to comment. Network designated staff will be asked to use the guideline in the direct care setting and provide feedback to the Network Guideline Champions. This portion of the field test is intended to provide feedback regarding the format and usability. At this time, the peer review of the guideline will also be completed by at least three VA /DoD staff, including primary care clinicians, who have been trained and previously assigned to perform the independent review. Within 3 weeks, the rating tool containing the reviewer’s comments and recommendation will be forwarded to the Office of Quality and Performance and the Vice Chairperson of the NCPG Council. The Vice Chairperson of the NCPG Council will forward a summary of the recommendations from the peer reviewers to the National Champions. Final editing incorporates feedback as appropriate. The National Senior Champions along with the Evidence Chaperone and the NCGPC Representative will integrate comments and suggestions into the final document as appropriate. Discussion of serious controversies regarding interpretation of the evidence will be included in the introduction to the guideline and may be the subject of discussion at the time of review with the Council. Provider tools will also be finalized and submitted to Employee Education System for final formatting. Prior to delivery to the NCPG Council, the champions group will re-convene by conference call to approve the final draft and tools.

QUALIFYING STATEMENTS

Clinical practice guidelines, which are increasingly being used in health care, are seen by many as a potential solution to inefficiency and inappropriate variations in care. Guidelines should be evidenced-based as well as based upon explicit criteria to ensure consensus regarding their internal validity. However, it must be remembered that the use of guidelines must always be in the context of a health care provider's clinical judgment in the care of a particular patient. For that reason, the guidelines may be viewed as an educational tool analogous to textbooks and journals, but in a more user-friendly format.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies are available at:  www.oqp.med.va.gov/cpg/

Print copies: Available from the Office of Quality and Performance (10Q), Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont, NW, Washington, DC 20420.

Copy Statement: No copyright restrictions apply