|
TITLE: MANAGEMENT OF
TOBACCO USE – UPDATE04
|
|
Citation:
|
|
Management of Tobacco Use.
Washington, DC: VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline Working Group, Veterans
Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs and Health Affairs,
Department of Defense, December 1999 (Update 2004). Office of Quality and Performance
publication 10Q-CPG/TUC-04.
|
|
|
Completion
Date:
|
|
June 2003
|
|
|
Release
Date:
|
|
November 2004
|
|
|
Source(s):
|
|
The Tobacco Use Guideline was
developed by and written for clinicians by the Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA), Department of Defense (DoD)
|
|
|
Adaptation:
|
|
The guideline draws heavily
from the 1999 VHA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline to Promote Tobacco Use
Cessation in the Primary Care Setting (v1.0; The Clinical Practice Guideline for Treating Tobacco Use and
Dependence. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services - Public Health
Service (PHS); June 2000; and the Recommendations Regarding Interventions
to Reduce Tobacco Use and Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke. Task
Force on Community Preventive Services; 2001.
|
|
|
Guideline
Status:
|
|
This is the current release
of the guideline update -2004. An
update is targeted for 2006.
|
|
|
Developer(s):
|
|
Veterans Health
Administration (VHA), Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) - Federal
Government Agency [U.S.]
Department of Defense (DoD) - Federal Government Agency [U.S.]
|
|
|
Funding
Source:
|
|
United States Government
|
|
|
Committee:
|
|
The Management of Tobacco Use
Working Group
|
|
|
Group
Composition:
|
|
The list of
contributors to this guideline includes nurses, therapists,
psychologists, educators and smoking cessation specialist, internal
medicine and primary care physicians, and experts in the field of guideline
and algorithm development.
|
|
|
Disease/Condition:
|
|
Tobacco Dependence
|
|
|
Category:
|
|
Screening; Treatment; Early
Recognition and Treatment of Co-morbid Conditions, Management; Evaluation
|
|
|
Intended
Users:
|
|
While designed for use by
primary care providers in an ambulatory care setting, the guideline can
also be used to coordinate and standardize care within subspecialty teams
and as teaching tools for students and house staff,
|
|
|
Target
Population:
|
|
Any person who is eligible
for care in the VA or DoD health care delivery system.
|
|
|
Contact Person(s):
|
|
VA:
Scott Sherman, MD, MPH
Smoking Cessation Coordinator
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System
16111 Plummer Street
Sepulveda, CA 91343
Phone: 818-891-7711, ext.9909
Fax: 818-894-5838
E-mail: scott.Sherman@med.va.gov
DoD:
Col Gerald Talcott, PhD
Chief, Community Prevention Division
AFMOA/SGZF
2664 Flight Nurse, B801
Brooks, AFB 78235
Phone: 210-536-6771
Fax: 210-536-9032
E-mail: Wayne.Talcott@brooks.af.mil
|
|
|
GOALS/OBJECTIVES
The ultimate goal of the
guideline is to assist patients to quit using tobacco and therefore,
improve clinical outcomes. The
guideline specifically:
- Describes
critical decision points in managing tobacco use cessation.
- Identifies
tobacco users at high risk of adverse outcomes associated with
continued tobacco use.
- Assists
primary medical care providers and specialists with the early
detection of symptoms, assessment of treatment readiness,
determination of the appropriate setting and intensity of treatment
and delivery of individualized interventions.
- Reinforces
the need for patient education regarding abstinence from tobacco and
prevention of future relapses.
|
|
INTERVENTIONS AND PRACTICES
The guideline is addressing
distinct aspects of the following:
Triage
Assessment
Behavioral treatment options
Pharmacotherapy
Further evaluation and
treatment
Primary prevention and
prevention of relapse
|
|
OUTCOMES CONSIDERED
Reduced tobacco or nicotine
use.
|
|
MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS
The Tobacco Use Cessation
(TUC) guideline is presented in an algorithmic format with
annotations. It focuses on
screening to determine current tobacco use, determining readiness to quit,
identifying appropriate interventions, assessing risk for starting tobacco
use, and assessing risk for relapse.
|
|
CLINICAL ALGORITHM ARE PROVIDED FOR:
Page one of the algorithm is addressing
Screening, Assessment, Behavioral treatment and Pharmacotherapy. Second algorithm addresses prevention and
relapse prevention in individual not using tobacco.
For an interactive algorithm with links to the
annotations return to the TUC-home page and select the link to the
"Complete Guideline"
|
|
TYPE OF EVIDENCE
The guideline is supported by the literature in a majority of areas with
evidence-based tables and references throughout the document. The evidence consists of key clinical
randomized controlled trials and longitudinal studies in the areas of
tobacco use cessation. Where
existing literature is ambiguous or conflicting, or where scientific data
are lacking on an issue, recommendations are based on the expert panel's
opinion and clinical experience.
The guideline contains an annotated bibliography and discussion of
the evidence supporting each recommendation.
|
|
DESCRIPTION
OF METHODS TO COLLECT EVIDENCE
The algorithm and annotations were based on an exhaustive review of the literature. The goal of the literature review was to
provide a systematic basis for the development of an evidence-based
guideline. The inclusion criteria
for the literature search were related to the population being studied
(adult) and the treatment setting (primary care).
The Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms
used for the search included key therapies in hypertension, study
characteristics, and study design.
In this search, study characteristics
were those of analytic studies, case-control studies, retrospective
studies, cohort studies, longitudinal studies, follow-up studies,
prospective studies, cross-sectional studies, clinical protocols,
controlled clinical trials, RCTs, intervention studies, and sampling
studies. Study design included
crossover studies, double-blind studies, matched pair analysis,
meta-analysis, random allocation, reproducibility of results, and sample
size.
See Tobacco Use Guideline
Introduction.
|
|
METHODS TO ASSESS THE QUALITY AND STRENGTH OF THE
EVIDENCE
The Grading
Scheme Used for the Guideline
| |
TABLE
1: Quality of Evidence (QE)
|
I
|
At least one properly done RCT
|
|
II-1
|
Well designed controlled trial without randomization
|
|
II-2
|
Well designed cohort or case-control analytic study
|
|
II-3
|
Multiple time series, dramatic results of
uncontrolled experiment
|
|
III
|
Opinion of respected authorities, case reports, and
expert committees
|
|
| |
TABLE
2: Overall Quality
|
Good
|
High grade evidence (I or II-1) directly linked to
health outcome
|
|
Fair
|
High grade evidence (I or II-1) linked to
intermediate outcome; or
grade evidence (II-2 or II-3) directly linked
to health outcome
|
|
Poor
|
Level III evidence or no linkage of evidence to
health outcome
|
|
| |
TABLE
3: Net Effect of the Intervention
|
Substantial
|
More than a small relative impact on a frequent
condition with a substantial burden of suffering; or
A large impact on an infrequent condition with
a significant impact on the individual patient level.
|
|
Moderate
|
A small relative impact on a frequent condition with
a substantial burden of suffering; or
A moderate impact on an infrequent condition
with a significant impact on the individual patient level.
|
|
Small
|
A negligible relative impact on a frequent condition
with a substantial burden of suffering; or
A small impact on an infrequent condition with
a significant impact on the individual patient level.
|
|
Zero or Negative
|
Negative impact on patients; or
No relative impact on either a frequent
condition with a substantial burden of suffering; or an infrequent
condition with a significant impact on the individual patient level.
|
|
| |
TABLE
4: Grade the Recommendation
|
A
|
A strong recommendation that the intervention is
always indicated and acceptable
|
|
B
|
A recommendation that the intervention may be
useful/effective
|
|
C
|
A recommendation that the intervention may be
considered
|
|
D
|
A recommendation that a procedure may be considered
not useful/effective, or may be harmful
|
|
I
|
Insufficient evidence to recommend for or against -
the clinician will use clinical judgment
|
|
|
|
REVIEW METHODS
Peer Review
|
|
ENDORSERS
VHA 's National Clinical Practice Guideline Council
DoD/VA Clinical Practice Guidelines Working Group
|
|
QUALIFYING
STATEMENTS
Clinical practice guidelines, which are increasingly being used in health
care, are seen by many as a potential solution to inefficiency and
inappropriate variations in care. Guidelines should be evidenced-based as
well as based upon explicit criteria to ensure consensus regarding their
internal validity. However, it must be remembered that the use of
guidelines must always be in the context of a health care provider's
clinical judgment in the care of a particular patient. For that reason, the
guidelines may be viewed as an educational tool analogous to textbooks and
journals, but in a more user-friendly tone.
|
|
GUIDELINE
AVAILABILITY
Electronic copies available from:
The Office of Quality and Performance web site.
|
|
Copy Statement: No copyright restrictions apply
|